background-shape
feature-image

We’re fortunate to earn money when you click on links to products or services we already know and love. This helps support the blog and allows us to continue to release free content. Read our full disclosure here.

We get it. You’re looking for a budgeting app, and YNAB keeps coming up.

It’s the gold standard. The one everyone recommends. The app with its own subreddit, podcast, and devoted fanbase that will corner you at parties to explain what “giving every dollar a job” means.

It’s genuinely good software.

But it might not be the right software for you, and this post will help you figure out which one actually fits your life.

Bottom line: Vermillion is the best YNAB alternative if you want your savings rate as your primary metric and prefer manual tracking. It’s also significantly cheaper: $60/year vs. $109/year.


What is YNAB?

YNAB (You Need A Budget) is a zero-based budgeting app that’s been around since 2004.

The premise: every dollar you earn gets “assigned” to a category before you spend it. You’re always budgeting with money you already have, not money you expect to have.

It works. A lot of people have completely turned their finances around using it.

It also costs $109/year (about $15 a month if you pay monthly), has a steep learning curve, and is built around a very specific philosophy that doesn’t fit every personality or situation.


What is Vermillion?

Vermillion is a web-based budgeting app built around one core idea:

Your savings rate is the most important number in your financial life.

Not your account balance. Not your budget surplus.

Your savings rate – the percentage of your income you’re actually keeping.

Most budgeting apps track whether you stayed under budget. Vermillion tracks whether you're actually getting ahead.

Your savings rate is the number that determines when, or whether, you’ll ever have financial breathing room. It’s more important than your income, your debt payoff timeline, or how well you did on groceries last month.


Most budgeting apps are really spending trackers.

Think about the last time you opened a budgeting app. What did you do?

You probably logged a purchase. Categorized a transaction. Checked whether you were under budget on dining.

Every interaction rewarded you for tracking your spending. The app gave you a green number. You felt good. You came back.

That’s not an accident – it’s how these apps are designed. When the only behavior an app tracks is spending, spending is the only behavior it can reward.

Vermillion is built around a different feedback loop entirely.

The number that goes up when you do well isn't "under budget on groceries." It's your savings rate -- the gap between money coming in and money going out.

The only number that actually tells you whether you’re getting ahead.


What budgeting app shows savings rate?

Vermillion is the only budgeting app that shows savings rate as the primary dashboard metric.

YNAB doesn’t surface it by default. Most apps treat savings as an afterthought – something that shows up in a small report, if at all.

We think that’s backwards. If you’re budgeting, it’s because you want to save more. So let’s make saving the main event.


The core difference: what do you want your app to reward you for?

YNAB will tell you whether you stayed within your categories.

If you budgeted $300 for groceries and spent $287, YNAB gives you a green number. You did it. You stayed under budget on groceries. Great.

But staying under budget on groceries is a spending behavior. An app that only rewards spending behaviors is training you to be a more attentive spender -- not a better saver.

Vermillion’s feedback loop is different. The metric that lights up when you're doing well is your savings rate -- the space you're building between what comes in and what goes out.

That’s the behavior worth reinforcing. And it’s the one no other app is built around.


Where YNAB wins

I said this would be honest, so here it is.

YNAB has a larger community.

The YNAB subreddit has hundreds of thousands of members. There are YouTube channels, podcasts, and accountants who speak YNAB fluently. If you love peer support and learning from other users, that ecosystem is real and valuable.

YNAB’s zero-based method is genuinely powerful for overspenders.

If your problem is that you spend first and ask questions later, YNAB’s “assign before you spend” model creates a real psychological barrier. It slows you down in a useful way.

YNAB has been around longer.

More polish, more integrations, more features built from years of user feedback.

If you’re a detail-oriented person who loves a structured methodology and doesn’t mind paying more for it, YNAB is probably a great fit.


Where Vermillion wins

Savings rate as the primary metric.

No other major budgeting app leads with this.

Knowing you came in $13 under on restaurants doesn't tell you whether you're building wealth. Knowing you saved 18% of your income this month does.

Other apps give you a green light for spending less. Vermillion gives you a green light for saving more. Those sound similar. They are not the same thing.


Manual tracking as a feature, not a bug.

Both Vermillion and YNAB support manual transaction entry – but Vermillion is built around it.

The act of manually logging a purchase is part of the point. It keeps you present with your spending in a way that automatic importing doesn’t.

YNAB offers auto-import and it’s popular. But interestingly, even YNAB’s own team has written about why they prefer manual entry:

“If you’re new to budgeting, have big financial aspirations, or you’re trying to make significant changes to your money habits, I can’t more highly recommend entering transactions yourself… if you simply link your bank accounts and let an app automatically record and reconcile your transactions, you’re missing out on a big piece of the budgeting experience.”
– YNAB blog

Auto-import is convenient. It's also a great way to stop paying attention to your money.

The price.

Vermillion is $6/month (or $60/year).

YNAB is $15/month (or $109/year).

If you're on a tight budget -- which, same -- paying less for your budgeting app is not ironic. It's just math.

Lower learning curve.

Both apps use zero-based budgeting, but YNAB’s method is a full philosophy with rules, terminology, and a significant onboarding commitment.

Vermillion is designed to make sense in an afternoon.


Is YNAB worth the price?

That depends on whether you’ll commit to the method fully.

YNAB’s higher price is justified if you use it consistently and engage with the community. A lot of people credit it with completely changing their finances.

But here’s the honest question to ask yourself: after months of budgeting, are you actually saving more – or are you just getting better at tracking where the money went?

If you've been budgeting for a while and feel like you're "doing it right" but not actually getting ahead, that's usually a savings rate problem, not a category problem.

YNAB is great at making you a more attentive spender. Vermillion is built to make you a better saver. Those are different goals, and they deserve different tools.


Which budgeting app is right for you?

✓ Vermillion YNAB
Primary metric Savings rate Budget balance
Budgeting method Zero-based Zero-based
Transaction tracking Manual-first Auto-import default
Monthly price $6/mo $15/mo
Annual price $60/yr $109/yr
Variable income Supported Supported
Learning curve Gentle Steep
Community size Growing Very large

Choose Vermillion if:

  • You want your savings rate front and center, not buried in reports
  • You believe active, manual tracking makes you a more intentional spender
  • You want a simpler, lower-cost option

Choose YNAB if:

  • You want a large, established community and tons of educational content
  • You’re fully committed to learning the zero-based method from scratch
  • Overspending (not under-saving) is your primary problem

Try Vermillion free for 30 days – no credit card required.

Related Posts